It
sucks to have an addiction. I personally have one of the most
insidious addictions known to man. I like computers. I like
fast computers. I perhaps like fast computers a little more
than is legal in some states. (Not the southern ones though.)
And so I spend money on the darned things. Sometimes more
money than I should. Ever since I built a new computer for
our good friend Pappy, using one of the tasty new Intel Core
2 Duo processors, I've been eyeing them on and off for my
next upgrade. It's been quite a while since I've upgraded
my system. My Athlon64 3800+ and MSI K8N-SLI motherboard have
stood by me well and true for a long time, in the case of
the motherboard and MSI 7800GT video cards for over a year.
It's unusual that I wait this long before upgrading but lately
it seems that hardware is just so fast there's not much point
in the once every few months upgrades that I did once upon
a time. These days a machine is lasting me at least a year
and in all honestly would probably last me two years even
playing the latest most demanding games. However we have to
take into account that darned addiction I was talking about
and lately I've been feeling that itch to upgrade so I finally
caved in and bought myself an Intel Core 2 Duo 6600, an ASUS
P5N32-SLI Premium motherboard, 2 gigs of OCZ DDR2-667 RAM
and an MSI Geforce 8800GTX video card. I would have preferred
to get myself an MSI motherboard as I rather like them and
they've been good to me but MSI claims that the Nforce for
Intel chipset have some issues so they're not manufacturing
the boards as of yet. Personally I haven't had any problems
with them so I went out and bought myself the ASUS board.
The 8800gtx
video card was actually purchased before the other parts but
the performance on it was rather disappointingly lackluster
and the only thing we could come up with was that it had an
issue with the 8x PCI-E on the ol' MSI K8N-SLI motherboard.
Once we had the video card and saw how poorly it performed
it was decided that if we were in for a dime we were in for
a dollar so we prayed that our instincts were right and the
mobo was indeed the problem and got all the other parts.
The Core
2 e6600 was selected for a few different reasons. The first
was price. It's half the price of the e6700 and a quarter
the price of the retardedly expensive e6800. It also performs
extremely well for it's price. The second reason was that
it's a 2.4ghz processor, exactly the same clock speed as the
old Athlon64 3800+ it was replacing so writing an article
comparing the two would be simpler.
Before
we gutted the machine and started the transformation we did
a series of benchmarks to get a comparison with the new system.
We timed the system's boot as well, but unfortunately for
everything to fit and work with the new motherboard we had
to change out the boot hard drive, so it wouldn't be all that
accurate.
Installation/Observations
MSI
8800GTX
8800gtx is huge and very quiet. And by huge we're talking
Big Bird on horse steroids huge. The MSI version of this card
is a dual slot monster and it's nearly a foot long. That's
a good thing in a hotdog but not so good in the tight confines
of a computer case. We had to move one of the hard drives
in the Thermal Take Matrix VX case up into one of the 5.25"
bays to make room. The video card actually goes right back
into one the hard drive bay. You wouldn't be mounting two
of those brutes in this case and in fact it wouldn't fit into
many of the mid tower cases we've seen. Make sure you've got
clearance before you buy one of these cards unless you're
looking at getting a bigger case. This video card also takes
two of the 6 pin PCI-E power cables and sucks an enormous
amount of power so make sure you've got a good power supply.
(No that $25 500 watt you got with your case won't cut it.)
 |
|
My
7800gt feels so inadequate. :( |
 |
|
Well,
there goes my neat hard drive wiring job. This card
is BIG. |
ASUS P5NSLI-Premium Wi-Fi Edition
The only
real installation issue (other than spacing problems) experienced
with the new motherboard was that our old setup used an IDE
drive for booting as well as two optical drives. The P5N32SLI-Premium
like most new motherboards only has one IDE connector and
six SATA connectors, so we had to ghost the boot drive over
to an SATA drive and do a repair installation on the new drive.
I wish that ASUS would give you the SATA installation drivers
on a floppy with the board as well, as MSI does. The installation
CD will create the floppy for you, but if you're replacing
a dead motherboard and don't have a second computer handy
that could be an issue.
The new system with the Intel e6600 and the ASUS P5N32SLI-Premium
is very, very quiet. The CPU runs at 1-3 degrees over the
case ambient temperature even under load and the stock fan
is quiet. It's nice to have a heat pipe on the motherboard
for cooling the chipset rather than those tiny annoying little
high RPM fans that always develop an annoying whine. We didn't
bother testing the onboard audio since we've got a Creative
X-fi Platinum in the system for audio and we've got a strict
aversion to onboard audio for anything involving gaming or
listening to music. The onboard wireless worked well in our
tests but we don't like wireless for gaming as we find that
wired always gives a better and more reliable connection.
We didn't test this feature, but the onboard wireless can
apparently work as a wireless access point which could be
handy if you didn't have a router.
 |
Hmmmm..
Heat pipes. Pretty AND quiet. |
The front facing SATA block on the P5N32SLI-Premion is a great
idea. Love it. It's a solid block of 6 SATA plugs. But again,
we're using a smallish mid tower case so we've got clearance
issues. The SATA cables are resting against the hard drive
mount inside the case. It's not a problem unless we decide
to hook up another hard drive or SATA device. Then it's going
to be time to play that delightful game we all love so much:
Remove the motherboard.
Also
on the SATA front, this is one of the first motherboards I've
seen that has rear SATA ports on the back panel. There's two
of the things and it took me a minute to realize what I was
looking at. I've only ever seen one external SATA device and
it was an external hard drive bay. I'm tempted to get one
it'd be nice to have an external hard drive that's almost
as fast as your internal drives. It's an idea that really
makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
Power
plug. Gah. The 26 pin PSU plug on the motherboard is mounted
front and center on the board. Right where I'd just moved
my hard drive to get it out of the way of the 8800GTX. The
ol' K8N-SLI had the power connecter back by the CPU, out of
the way where it should be. The connector location wouldn't
be a problem in a larger case, but again I'm struck down by
the small midtower blues and forces to move the hard drive
yet again.
ASUS are clever monkeys, they included some little adapters
for the front panel, USB and firewire. I couldn't figure out
what they were for then Protocal pointed out that they allow
you to plug all your headers into them then plug the whole
adapter into the motherboard rather than screwing around trying
to read the tiny silk screening and get cables plugged into
the right spots. It's a small thing but it's slick as heck
and worked great.
 |
Less
screwing around with big fingers and tiny pins is good.
|
ASUS
also included enough cables to wire a house with this motherboard.
It came with all of the normal back plates (USB, Sound and
Firewire) as well a 6 SATA cables and SATA power splitters,
floppy and IDE cables.
Once the whole system was assembled we did a repair install
on our month old Windows XP install, loaded all the new drivers
and we were ready to go.
Benchmarking
We've
done benchmarks using the old system which was an Athlon 3800+
on an MSI K8N-SLI motherboard with 2 gigs of corsair XMS DDR400
RAM as well as the new rig. We used Aquamark at various quality
settings as well as 3D Mark 2003, 2005, 2006, and Doom3 at
various settings as well. We consider Aquamark to be a decent
benchmark even it's not particularly relevant to modern games
as it seems to be quite CPU dependant. We've dropped most
of the Aquamark benchmarks as they showed very similar results
on both systems and video cards no matter what we put the
settings to. The drivers used testing were the latest official
Nvidia, 93.71 for the 7800gt and 97.02 for the 8800gtx. The
system was left at it's default settings with no overclocking
or tweaking. For comparison we've also included the benchmarks
from our original 7800gt SLI article of September 2005 where
applicable.
| Aquamark3 |
| 4x
Image Quality (aa), 16x Antistropic Filtering, Triple
Buffering, 32 Bit |
| |
640x480 |
800x600 |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
| 3800+
7800gt |
70,163 |
69,753 |
69,669 |
69,530 |
| 3800+
8800gtx |
74,449 |
74,274 |
73,808 |
73,625 |
| e6600
7800gt |
90,761 |
90,328 |
90,170 |
90,130 |
| e6600
8800gtx |
108,384 |
107,988 |
107,440 |
107,069 |
| 3D
Mark 2003, 2005 and 2006. |
| Default
Settings. CPU test result in brackets. |
| |
2003 |
2005 |
2006 |
| 3500+
7800gt |
13,848 |
6,719 |
not
tested |
| 3500+
7800gt SLI |
22,890 |
9,331 |
not
tested |
| 3800+
7800gt |
14,125
(916) |
6,772
(4,372) |
3,412
(918) |
| 3800+
8800gtx |
27,586
(893) |
10,782
(4,579) |
6,086
(920) |
| e6600
7800gt |
16,450
(1,262) |
7,048
(5,924) |
3,882
(1,968) |
| e6600
8800gtx |
31,596
(1,232) |
13,574
(6,398) |
9,490
(1,987) |
As you
can see, the 8800gtx really shows it's colors on the more
grueling of the benchmarks. It's faster in Aquamark, but it's
not a "wow!" faster.... Unlike the 3Dmarks 2003
and 2005 where it's getting almost double the benchmarks and
3Dmark 2006 where it's over twice as fast.
At this point, much thanks was given to the computer gods.
If the benchmark results with the 8800 weren't better on the
new mobo and CPU much wailing, lamentation and gnashing of
teeth would have ensued.
After getting our results from the Aquamark and the various
3D Marks we moved on to the test that separates the real gaming
video cards from the S3 and Matrox wannabes.... Doom 3.
We did a fresh install and patched it up to 1.3 then ran the
"timedemo demo1" command from the console. It was
run twice for each test to get the real result. We were unable
to run 16x anti-aliasing on the 8800gtx as Doom3 would just
reset it's video to default when this setting was enabled.
Not sure what's going on there.
| Doom3
patch 1.3 |
| Ultra
Quality 1024x768, Time Demo 1. |
| |
no
AA* |
2x |
4x |
8x |
| 3500+
7800gt |
76.1 |
75.7 |
71.9 |
40.4 |
| 3500+
7800gt SLI |
74.6 |
74.1 |
74.1 |
67.5 |
| 3800+
7800gt |
82.1 |
81.4 |
76.2 |
43.0 |
| 3800+
8800gtx |
81.7 |
81.6 |
81.9 |
81.4 |
| e6600
7800gt |
100.7 |
97.9 |
85.9 |
43.9 |
| e6600
8800gtx |
100.4 |
99.7 |
100.0 |
98.7 |
| Doom3
patch 1.3 |
| Ultra
Quality 1280x1024, Time Demo 1. |
| |
no
AA* |
2x |
4x |
8x |
| 3500+
7800gt |
not
tested |
not
tested |
not
tested |
not
tested |
| 3500+
7800gt SLI |
not
tested |
not
tested |
not
tested |
not
tested |
| 3800+
7800gt |
80.9 |
75.2 |
57.6 |
20.7 |
| 3800+
8800gtx |
81.8 |
81.5 |
81.6 |
77.6 |
| e6600
7800gt |
95.3 |
84.3 |
60.5 |
21.4 |
| e6600
8800gtx |
99.9 |
100.0 |
100.1 |
89.3 |
We were originally just planning on testing Doom 3 with our
regular LCD monitors but after we saw the results at 1280x1024
we hooked up a 19" CRT just to run the same tests on the
new setup at 1600x1200 and see if we could slow it down any.
As you can see below even at those resolutions the 8800gtx still
powers through.
| Doom3
patch 1.3 |
| Ultra
Quality 1600x1200, Time Demo 1. |
| |
no
AA* |
2x |
4x |
8x |
| 3800+
7800 gt |
70.5 |
61.4 |
45.4 |
13.8 |
| 3800+
7800 gt sli |
73.8 |
72.6 |
66.9 |
26.3 |
| e6600
8800gtx |
100.4 |
99.9 |
95.8 |
71.6 |
Conclusions
From the benchmarks it's fairly obvious that the 8800GTX likes
the new motherboard and processor. It's also rather obvious
that it only really stretches itself out when you hit high
levels of anti-aliasing and higher resolutions, much like
our SLI 7900gt benchmark results from a year ago. Sure the
8800gtx is fast, but is it something you need? Unless you
absolutely have to have the newest and fastest toys and you
don't have a fairly fast video card already I'd recommend
waiting for the next revision of the 8800 cards, which hopefully
will be smaller and cooler. Even sitting at idle the heatsink
on the MSI 8800GTX is hot enough that you can't touch it for
more than a few seconds, but it is quiet with that huge fan.
It has been perfectly stable even through our long benchmarking
and gaming sessions, so hopefully the heat it generates isn't
an issue. It'll be interesting to see how this card handles
newer games such as Crysis and Quake Wars when they come out.
The ASUS
P5N32SLI-Premium is a super quiet, well laid out motherboard.
The only downfalls of the board are it's lack of PCI slots
(It only has two) which shouldn't really be an issue for most
users, the location of the PSU plug and the SATA block which
aren't a problem unless you have a very small case. Combined
with the Intel E6600 processor it performs well, is very stable
and installed without any problems and I'd have no problems
recommending it to anyone who's looking for a good high end
motherboard.
The system is noticeably snappier with the new processor and
motherboard as well. We were surprised at how much smoother
things are and at how much faster the system boots up and
loads all of our software.
|